一孔录子曰：攻乎异端，斯害也已。Tap any sentence of the original to copy it with its source.
常The common reading
对异端要攻击。
注Key words in the commentary
范祖禹“攻，专治也，故治木石金玉之工曰攻”；“异端，非圣人之道，而别为一端，如杨墨是也”。
家What other commentators say
程子以佛为更大的害（宋儒对本朝的判断）；刘宝楠《正义》记孙奕：攻＝攻击，已＝停止，意思相反。
读How Yikonglu reads it
照朱熹取“钻进去有害”。
家Other commentaries
Our base text is Zhu Xi's Collected Commentaries (above). Here are other commentaries side by side: for old commentaries, the first line of the sub-commentary with a link to the woodblock scan; for modern editions, one short quoted translation for comparison. The “compared with Zhu Xi” notes are written by Yikonglu, not quoted.
皇侃《论语义疏》Liang dynasty · Zhibuzu Zhai edition · juan 一
“此章禁人雜學諸子百家之書也。”……
Compared with Zhu Xi
| Commentary | Point | Relation | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| 钱穆《论语新解》 | differs | 钱以攻为专攻，异端为相反的一端，戒偏执；朱以异端为非圣人之道，举杨墨例。 | |
| 杨伯峻《论语译注》 | 攻 | word sense | 杨为攻击，已为消灭；朱引范氏以攻为专治，谓专治异端为害。 |
核Check every citation
Every commentary line quoted in the video: the original wording, who said it, and the page in the base edition. “Paraphrase” marks our summary, not the commentator's words. About this edition
| Quoted text | Source | Page |
|---|---|---|
| “攻，专治也，故治木石金玉之工曰攻” | Fan Zuyu, quoted by Zhu Xi | page 31 |
| “异端，非圣人之道，而别为一端，如杨墨是也。其率天下至于无父无君，专治而欲精之，为害甚矣” | Fan Zuyu, quoted by Zhu Xi | page 31 |
| paraphrase佛氏之言，比之杨墨，尤为近理，所以其害为尤甚。学者当如淫声美色以远之，不尔，则骎骎然入于其中矣 | Cheng Yi, quoted by Zhu Xi | page 31 |
| paraphrase攻＝攻击、已＝止一说 | 刘宝楠《论语正义》所记宋人孙奕《示儿编》说 | page 52 |
页Pages of the base edition
Yikonglu, Analects Wei zheng (Book 2) 2.16 “攻乎异端”, https://yikonglu.com/en/lunyu/wei-zheng/16.html, version 2026-11-04.Last checked: 2026-11-04. Changes are logged on theerrata page.
Found an error in this chapter? Email us; once checked, it goes on the errata page under your username: 
看Watch this chapter
This chapter is read in Yikonglu episode “为政四”:YouTubeBilibili(in mainland China use Bilibili)
